School Shootings: John Travolta Blames Psychiatric Drugs

June 19, 2007

John Travolta hairspray

John Travolta, who plays a woman in “Hair Spray,” has decided to blame Virginia Tech and Columbine on psychiatric drugs. According to Page Six, John Travolta said,

“I still think that if you analyze most of the school shootings, it is not gun control. It is [psychotropic] drugs at the bottom of it”

Oh. That explains everything. I’m pretty sure the only factor in the Virginia Tech shooting was a crazy man with two guns who probably needed more medication to calm his crazy ass down.

Also, as a flashback, a little more than one year ago, Tom Cruise revealed a very similar view on psychiatric drugs. According to Hollywood, Tom said,

“I’ve always found the ‘if it makes me feel better, it’s OK’ rationale a little suspect.

“I think it’s appalling that people have to live a life of drug addiction when I have personally helped people get off drugs.”

I’ve always found the “Treat a Sci-Fi novel as the new Bible” rationale a little suspect myself.

source and source

{ 26 comments }

Expert#1 June 19, 2007 at 4:12 pm

It’s because he and Tom Cruise are both Scientologists. They believe psychiatry is bogus. They also believe most medication is bogus as well.

Derek Hail June 19, 2007 at 4:13 pm

I personally think Scientology is bogus.

Ron Mexico June 19, 2007 at 4:21 pm

Personally I think Tom Cruise is right about prescription drugs

Chris June 19, 2007 at 4:38 pm

@Ron Mexico

I think it’s dangerous to take sides. There certainly seems to be a prevalent practice of over-prescribing medications. That’s a bad thing. However, writing off prescription medications all together is like taking a stand against water. Too much water can kill you so we’re better off without it. That’s just crazy.

How about not taking sides? Any group that makes extremism part of their doctrine is dangerous. Life is about gray areas and middle ground.

Roja June 19, 2007 at 4:38 pm

I don’t care for Scientology, but I agree that psychiatric drugs aren’t the answer. I think they are doing more harm then good.

tanel June 19, 2007 at 5:12 pm

I think the fact that cruise and travolta are scientologists (or whatever they believe) doesn’t really make their claims invalid (or valid).

were the shooters on psychiatric drugs or not ? I see no discussion or facts in your article, only making fun on some guys beliefs. sucks

don’t care for scientology myself, but isn’t it travoltas or cruises own choice what they believe and not?

keith June 19, 2007 at 5:15 pm

Its been clinically proven that anti-depresents in young people can lead to erratic moods resulting in suicidal\homicidal thinking. If you look at these shootings all the shooters were on these drugs. Doesn’t mean they weren’t crazy already but if the drug has been proven to make some people even crazier…

Bozo June 19, 2007 at 5:20 pm

Don’t believe the hype… John T. is an idiot… + cruise ( clear? ). These people are celebrities ( narcissistic ) and should be avoided at all costs. They are dangerous and are undoubtedly responsible for the school shootings, war and aids. I heard that scientologists have gay sex parties and bath in the blood of innocent children….

Steve June 19, 2007 at 5:21 pm

To say that psychiatric drugs aren’t the answer is a blanket statement that you shouldn’t make. There are a lot of people who couldn’t live a normal life without them. The problem is doctors over prescribing them because pharmaceutical companies bribe them with expensive dinners for the whole office and gifts.

I do agree that anti-depression drugs may not be entirely safe and can cause more harm than good, but that’s not true in most cases. To say all of them are bad is crazy, but not nearly as crazy as taking the rantings of a science fiction novelist as religious dogma.

Scientologists are the ones doing the real harm, by convincing sick people that they need to give their money to Scientology instead of a doctor. We need severe medical reforms, not idiot self-righteous Hollywood elite fearing alien soul particles and zoloft.

Bozo June 19, 2007 at 5:25 pm

Oh, and Keiths comment ( above ) is absurd and based on factoids ( no factoids are not facts ) just like John and Toms.

I have written a poem (not my own )for those of you who talk without really knowing anything
‘Wise old owl sat on an oak,
the more that he heard the less that he spoke.
The less that he spoke the more that he heard,
why can’t we all be like that wise old bird?’

Rob June 19, 2007 at 5:47 pm

ironically, anti-depressants HAVE been linked with violent outbreaks in a small % of people that take them.
People have reported feeling very violent, suicidal, etc.
So, the wacko scientologists are right on this one.
Rob

Gage June 19, 2007 at 5:48 pm

If I remember correctly, Seung-Hui Cho wasn’t on prescription drugs… In fact, his family was too poor to afford treatment for him. So in such a case, maybe psychiatric medication might have stopped such an incident.

skeptic June 19, 2007 at 6:00 pm

How does 1 student kill 33?

We are supposed to believe that this guy is some sort of unstoppable killing machine? No one was brave enough to jump him while he reloaded?

4 hours he was allowed to go on a killing spree without interference from the police?

Does the date of the attack not raise questions. Look up the week for April 20th and you’ll see what I’m talking about.

Wake up people, he didn’t act alone.

If he didn’t act alone, who helped him?

marc June 19, 2007 at 6:02 pm

You are not depressed because you lack drugs.

You are depressed because you think you have problems.

Drugs do not solve problems, they hide them.

Scientology has a method which they call clearing that helps remove the cause of the problem and not cover it up. The cause is your thinking, the energy you keep feeding it, they help you stop feeding it… but … I don’t agree with the rest of their crazy ideas about how this all came about.

As the saying goes don’t through out the sink with the dishwater, there is some truth or else so many people wouldn’t buy into it. And “buy into it” is more true than you know… do some research. It’s all out there.

Check out Eckhart Tolle, he also understands the human condition of suffering, but guess what? He offers all the information he has on the subject in the books he has to offer. Scientology requires you to pay each step of the way.

Steve June 19, 2007 at 6:37 pm

Sometimes people are depressed because of a chemical imbalance in their brains.

Frog June 19, 2007 at 7:33 pm

Seung-Hui Cho wasn’t on any type of anti-depressant…so how did anti-depressants cause the VT shootings?

cenourinha June 19, 2007 at 8:06 pm

Drugs sucks!

Ash June 19, 2007 at 9:33 pm

To make such a huge claim about psyciatric drugs is a big deal! Its pretty hard to take anyone seriously if they aren’t actually in the industry and don’t have an in depth knowlege of the drugs themselves.

Scientologists blame psychiatrists for the holocaust!

I believe that scientologists don’t like psychologists because they would tell them that scientology is a brainwashing cult. Make sense for them to dismiss them right?

Chuck D Sanders June 20, 2007 at 1:24 am

First of all, to blame medication as the soul reason for this terrible event is irresponsible. However, this coming from a Scientologist shouldn’t be surprising. These people who believe in a science fiction story as a their bible and want to ban pyscology all together. In addition, since when did an “actor” really bring to light a real situation. Just my 2 cents. John Keep acting in your bad movies and stay out of the social scene

Chris June 20, 2007 at 3:16 am

I personally think these people are idiots. If they were creationists they would be blamming it on “evolution in the schools”. They don’t know what they are talking about but they don’t care.

Greg June 20, 2007 at 10:07 am

While Scientologists’ (=Travolta) blind opposition to psychiatry and psychiatric medication is out of line, in this case they may actually have a case. But hear me out before condemning me, because the lesson is better psychiatric diagnosis and care, not avoidance of them.

Specifically, the interaction between bipolar disorder and unipolar depression, and the medication for them both, needs to be handled better. Bipolar disorder often presents itself, especially if diagnosis is not careful enough, as unipolar depression, and anti-depressants are prescribed. (the fellow in WV was prescribed anti-depressants, although I read hear he was too poor do buy them – since the medical records were just now released to the commission, the truth is still coming out, and let’s remember that almost all doctors have little boxes of “samples” they often give people when initially prescribing, either to cover them until a prescription can be filled or to help people who may have trouble getting drugs paid for). However, if the person suffers not from unipolar but from bipolar depression, then anti-depressants will often have the side effect of what is now called “Bipolar III,” or anti-depressant induced mania. (”Mania” here can be more specifically described as “frenetic energy, often with aspects of rage, and lack of inhibition and control”. Sounds like a recipe for a school shooting to me).

From what I’ve read, it sounds like the shooter may have been a likely candidate for bipolar, in that there was already an element of rage in his behavior. Where adult bipolar is characterized by swings between depression and mania, adolescent bipolar is increasingly being understood as characterized by fits of rage.

So, is it possible that Travolta is right, and that anti-depressants triggered the shooting? Absolutely. But where he concludes that we should do away with anti-depressants and embrace Scientology’s program of cleansing and purification, I think the more accurate lesson is that we need to apply better methods of discriminating between similar neurological disorders which require different medication approaches. For example, ADD, bipolar, and unipolar depression are all considered “spectrum” disorders, related and often comorbid, but the approach for one may cause a negative reaction in someone with shades of another.

Frog June 20, 2007 at 1:12 pm

What fellow in WV are you referring to? The only 2 shootings we’re discussing happened in Littleton, CO, and Blacksburg, VA. The shooter wasn’t on any anti-depressants at the time, not even samples. And he wasn’t an adolescent; he was a 23 year old man.

Greg June 20, 2007 at 1:23 pm

I was referring to Blacksburg, VA (Virginia, West Virginia, my bad). Since his medical records were only recently released to the investigatory commission, how do you know for sure he wasn’t on anything? The same news sources that initially reported he was on anti-depressants?

As far as adolescent, I was referring to reports that he had issues with rage dating back to high school.

Motorcycle Guy June 21, 2007 at 5:21 pm

slap it in a textbook and just blame it on genetics

Jesus Haploid Christ July 5, 2007 at 12:58 am

What’s the difference between scientology and other religions? Just a couple thousand years, that’s it. Nothing more.

There’s nothing in dianetics that’s any more preposterous or ridiculous than the bible, koran or any book with an imaginary friend that causes people to kill each other and treat people who don’t believe in their personal imaginary friend like crap.

At least the idiots in scientology don’t hate women and homos *as much* as the idiot christians, idiot muslims, idiot buddhists. Don’t get me wrong, they hate ‘em, but not quite as much.

Yes, buddhism is too a religion, you hippie. It posits a subjective order to the universe: cause & effect.

Why do you care if someone likes kissing someone of the same sex? Giving a crap what someone else does with his or someone else’s genitals puts you in the same category as a religious zealot.

Oh, and you… you “spiritual” folks. You’re the worst; you won’t even commit to something. You’re so lazy and/or self centered that you MAKE up a way to get close to some imaginary friend.

Come on… Give it up, people. We’ve gone so long with this “deity in the sky” crap. Let’s stop for a while. Just a year, okay? This god stuff is killing us. Please.

After a year of everyone being rational and realizing that killing and torturing people who look different is horrible, then you can all go back to hating yourselves, your women and your hairdresser.

Deal?

Jesus Haploid Christ July 5, 2007 at 1:15 am

Oh yeah. Chris.

Take a side. Make a decision. For once in your life.

The girls you’re fucking who think you’re so cool when you tell them stuff like that at parties aren’t worth the Venezuelan rubber that condom’s made out of.

Take a side. Figure something out and stand by it.

Change your mind. That’s good. That means you’re learning, but not choosing is taking a side too.

For example: I say to you “Chris, I think you’re a wishy-washy, passive-aggressive dunderhead and you’re better off painting the sky.”

You would probably say “Hey lady, that’s your opinion” even though a rational, logical, person would either offer up some sort of argument as to why he wasn’t, walk away or, better yet, think for a moment and say “You know, you’re right… I’ve been trying so hard to get people to like me that I’m bored with everyone around me because they all smoke pot and listen to dave matthews and talk about… i can’t even remember what they talk about… but… I should really try to figure out who I am and then be ME. Then, I probably wouldn’t get flamed by some crazy woman I don’t even know on some internet gossip site message board…”

And you wouldn’t even realize that each one of those is a side.

You take sides every day. You make decisions every day. You make judgments every day.

You quit trying to get along with everyone and I’ll try to quit antagonizing everyone.

Deal?

Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post: Lindsay Lohan Cancels 21st Birthday Party

Next post: Evangeline Lilly Plays Dress Up, could be a farmer’s wife