Kate Bosworth, although previously shown as an alleged anorexic seven months ago, seemingly gained some weight. After a disgusting glimpse down Kate’s shirt, the celebrity gossip army began calling her all sorts of names including Skeletor and Bosworth Bones. However, in these bikini pictures, although she is still by no means a sexy woman, she doesn’t look sickly.
Now, my question is, who is her friend and how big are her legs? She could kick through armored tanks with those tree trunks.
Alessia Ventura Bikini Pictures
Abigail Clancy Bikini Pictures
Natalie Portman Bikini Pictures
Celebrity Pictures
Awesome Bikini Contest!
Tara Reid Cleavage in FHM
Jenna Jameson Runway Pictures
Hilary Duff Nip Pics
Eva Mendes Topless in Maxim
Angelina Jolie Naked in Park Avenue
{ 16 comments }
she looks fine
she looks beautiful again. healthy and still thin! it IS possible. kate, keep it up!!
She definitely does look a hell of a lot better
I don’t think her friend’s legs look big. They’re just next to toothpicks.
Her mother needs a bigger bikini bottom! The one she is wearing barely covers the subject.
She still looks like a bobble head. Gross. Anorexia is NOT pretty.
I completely disagree with you…I think Kate’s friend has a terrific figure and her legs are great. There is nothing attractive about stick legs, this girl has athletic beautifully toned legs.
You are an idiot. The girl beside Kate looks healthy and beautiful. I love how you are saying that one girl is a recovering anorexic but the girl beside her has fat legs. Don’t you realize that it is people like you that make women self concious about there bodies. Your probably just a loser who loathes themselves so much they have to project their insecurities on others. GET A LIFE!
Apparently there’s only about a 10 pound range between “anorexic” and “fat”. Her friend is most certainly not fat.
Erica, I did not say she had fat legs. I said her legs are huge, which means she’s probably an athlete. Not fat all, just muscular, which is sexy in my opinion.
The tree trunk comment is really uncalled for- her friend is still small, Kate is just miniscule. Her legs are hardly huge! Not huge muscular, not huge fat, not huge period. In fact, she has a pretty nice body in general. What would normal legs be to you?
Compared to Kate, they’re tree trunks
Saying a woman has “tree trunks” for legs is never a compliment. Anybody would look HUGE standing next to Kate. Well, maybe not a 5 year old.
Derek, may I suggest you reacquaint yourself with the proportions of “huge” in the real world? TIA.
Thanks for fucking up Lois Lane, douchetwat
What the hell is wrong with you?! That girl’s legs look good, you idiot! I’d take those legs over skinny ass toothpick legs any day.
Comments on this entry are closed.