Place this code last in "body":

Kate Bosworth in a Bikini, gains some weight

April 30, 2007

Kate Bosworth Bikini Pictures

Kate Bosworth, although previously shown as an alleged anorexic seven months ago, seemingly gained some weight. After a disgusting glimpse down Kate’s shirt, the celebrity gossip army began callingĀ  her all sorts of names including Skeletor and Bosworth Bones. However, in these bikini pictures, although she is still by no means a sexy woman, she doesn’t look sickly.

Now, my question is, who is her friend and how big are her legs? She could kick through armored tanks with those tree trunks.

Kate Bosworth Pictures 3Kate Bosworth Naked (almost)Kate Bosworth Bikini picKate Bosworth Bikini CandidKate Bosworth Bikini photo

Alessia Ventura Bikini Pictures
Abigail Clancy Bikini Pictures
Natalie Portman Bikini Pictures
Celebrity Pictures

{ 16 comments }

attagirl April 30, 2007 at 11:43 am

she looks fine

jackie xox April 30, 2007 at 11:44 am

she looks beautiful again. healthy and still thin! it IS possible. kate, keep it up!!

Derek Hail April 30, 2007 at 11:51 am

She definitely does look a hell of a lot better

Jayde April 30, 2007 at 11:54 am

I don’t think her friend’s legs look big. They’re just next to toothpicks.

eyeshaveit April 30, 2007 at 11:55 am

Her mother needs a bigger bikini bottom! The one she is wearing barely covers the subject.

Jen April 30, 2007 at 12:16 pm

She still looks like a bobble head. Gross. Anorexia is NOT pretty.

Susie April 30, 2007 at 12:55 pm

I completely disagree with you…I think Kate’s friend has a terrific figure and her legs are great. There is nothing attractive about stick legs, this girl has athletic beautifully toned legs.

Erica April 30, 2007 at 1:21 pm

You are an idiot. The girl beside Kate looks healthy and beautiful. I love how you are saying that one girl is a recovering anorexic but the girl beside her has fat legs. Don’t you realize that it is people like you that make women self concious about there bodies. Your probably just a loser who loathes themselves so much they have to project their insecurities on others. GET A LIFE!

Hootie April 30, 2007 at 1:21 pm

Apparently there’s only about a 10 pound range between “anorexic” and “fat”. Her friend is most certainly not fat.

Derek Hail April 30, 2007 at 2:04 pm

Erica, I did not say she had fat legs. I said her legs are huge, which means she’s probably an athlete. Not fat all, just muscular, which is sexy in my opinion.

sarah April 30, 2007 at 2:25 pm

The tree trunk comment is really uncalled for- her friend is still small, Kate is just miniscule. Her legs are hardly huge! Not huge muscular, not huge fat, not huge period. In fact, she has a pretty nice body in general. What would normal legs be to you?

Derek Hail April 30, 2007 at 2:34 pm

Compared to Kate, they’re tree trunks

k April 30, 2007 at 3:31 pm

Saying a woman has “tree trunks” for legs is never a compliment. Anybody would look HUGE standing next to Kate. Well, maybe not a 5 year old.

Henny Penny April 30, 2007 at 8:30 pm

Derek, may I suggest you reacquaint yourself with the proportions of “huge” in the real world? TIA.

hotbox April 30, 2007 at 9:41 pm

Thanks for fucking up Lois Lane, douchetwat

Kelli May 2, 2007 at 10:13 am

What the hell is wrong with you?! That girl’s legs look good, you idiot! I’d take those legs over skinny ass toothpick legs any day.

Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post: Leonardo DiCaprio is with Petra Nemcova? Step aside Bar Refaeli

Next post: Keeley Hazell in Australian Zoo Magazine